Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43944C73.9000903@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: >Bruce Momjian said: > > >>OK, a few things. First, Tom has fixed snprintf.c so it should >>properly process positional parameters now. Would you first test the >>libintl version of *printf to see if it can process %$ parameters >>(probably by hacking up any language file and testing the printing), >>and then try your patch below to see if it is properly reorders the >>arguments. If libintl does not reorder properly, but our snprintf.c >>does, would you please generate an appliable patch we can put into >>8.1.X? Thanks. >> >>I know I am asking a lot, but you are "the man" on this one. :-) >> >> >> > >Since the effect of the configure change I am proposing to reverse was to >force use of the *printf in libintl, don't we already know the answer to >your first question from Nicolai's report? > > > > However, a very simple test shows that the libintl printf does indeed do %m$ processing: $ cat testpf.c #include <libintl.h> main() { printf("%2$s %1$s\n","arg1","arg2"); } $ gcc -o testpf testpf.c -lintl $ ./testpf.exe arg2 arg1 $ So the next question is why isn't it working in the build. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: