Re: Why is bool == java.sql.Types.BIT ??
От | Oliver Jowett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is bool == java.sql.Types.BIT ?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4386277B.8070906@opencloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is bool == java.sql.Types.BIT ?? (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Thomas Kellerer wrote: > Oliver Jowett wrote on 24.11.2005 00:50: > >> Thomas Kellerer wrote: >> >>> The problem comes when supporting multiple DBMS. With MS SQL Server a >>> bit column can only store 0/1 (which is not what the driver returns, >>> as it uses a java.lang.Boolean) but PG only accepts the literals >>> true/false. That's why I stumbled over this in the first place. >>> >>> So I'll have to check the native type rather then the JDBC type to be >>> sure. >> >> >> >> Can't you use setBoolean()/getBoolean()? I think that's specified to >> always work on a BIT column, whatever the real underlying type is. >> > > Yes of course I can and actually I do when using PreparedStatements > But when I'm generating SQL Scripts I need to use the correct literal > for such a column. Well, if you're going to bypass the abstractions that JDBC gives you to deal with this sort of case, of course you will end up with DBMS-specific code.. -O
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: