Re: TSearch2 Questions
От | Hannes Dorbath |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TSearch2 Questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43831B29.5020804@theendofthetunnel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TSearch2 Questions (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 21.11.2005 18:24, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 16:50:00 +0300, Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Hannes Dorbath wrote: >> >>> I'm playing a bit with it ATM. Indexing one Gigabyte of plain text worked >>> well, with 10 GB I yet have some performance problems. I read the TSearch >>> Tuning Guide and will start optimizing some things, but is it a realistic >>> goal to index ~90GB plain text and get sub-second response times on >>> hardware that ~4000 EUR can buy? >> What's ATM ? As for the sub-second response times it'd very depend on >> your data and queries. It'd be certainly possible with our tsearch daemon >> which we postponed, because we inclined to implement inverted indices first >> and then build fts index on top of inverted index. But this is long-term >> plan. > > I believe in this context, 'ATM' is an ancronym for 'at the moment' which > has little impact on the meaning of the paragraph. For whatever reason I cannot find Oleg's reply on this server, so I reply to this post instead. Thanks for your time Oleg, your answers really helped me. I still have two questions about compound words and UTF-8, but I'll create a new specific post. Thanks again. -- Regards, Hannes Dorbath
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: