Re: drop if exists - first piece
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: drop if exists - first piece |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437F6559.1010602@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: drop if exists - first piece (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: >New test seems reasonable. > > done. >A few other minor comments: > >* The NOTICEs should probably not carry an ERRCODE; usually you just >want a notice to go out with the default "not an error" SQLSTATE. > > done. >* The "Assert(missing_ok)"s are a waste of code space --- if >ereport(ERROR) ever returned, there would be vast swaths of the backend >that fail, so there's no point in asserting it only here. They also >make the reader stop to wonder why they are there, which is probably a >bigger objection. > > done, but I left one with a modified test to reflect what we are really testing, i.e. that we didn't fall of the end of a message table. >* It's probably not a good idea to assume that "IF" is a safe name for >a parser symbol --- too much risk of collision with other macros. >I'd suggest "IF_P". > > done. Thanks for the review. Committed as above. I will probably do DROP DATABASE IF EXISTS shortly, but anyone who wants to jump in on others is welcome to. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: