Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
От | Alan Stange |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437DDA26.4000603@rentec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Richard Huxton wrote: > Dave Cramer wrote: >> >> On 18-Nov-05, at 1:07 AM, Luke Lonergan wrote: >> >>> Postgres + Any x86 CPU from 2.4GHz up to Opteron 280 is CPU bound >>> after >>> 110MB/s of I/O. This is true of Postgres 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1. >>> >>> A $1,000 system with one CPU and two SATA disks in a software RAID0 >>> will >>> perform exactly the same as a $80,000 system with 8 dual core CPUs >>> and the >>> world's best SCSI RAID hardware on a large database for decision >>> support >>> (what the poster asked about). >> >> >> Now there's an interesting line drawn in the sand. I presume you >> have numbers to back this up ? >> >> This should draw some interesting posts. That's interesting, as I occasionally see more than 110MB/s of postgresql IO on our system. I'm using a 32KB block size, which has been a huge win in performance for our usage patterns. 300GB database with a lot of turnover. A vacuum analyze now takes about 3 hours, which is much shorter than before. Postgresql 8.1, dual opteron, 8GB memory, Linux 2.6.11, FC drives. -- Alan
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: