Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437DD155.8060508@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I now notice that "pg_ctl -w start" fails if the postgres db is missing. I am not sure that changing pg_ctl to use this rather than template1 was a good thing, and it can't be overridden. I suggest we revert that particular change - it seems to me to confer little to no benefit, unlike the case with createdb etc. cheers andrew Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >>> >>> It does seem a bit inconsistent that psql wouldn't connect to the >>> specified database in order to do -l, if one is specified. >>> Anyone want to look and see if it's easy to change? >>> >>> >> >> >> options.action == ACT_LIST_DB && options.dbname == NULL ? >> "postgres" : options.dbname >> > > Tested, and worked fine. > > Committed on Head and 8.1 branches. > > cheers > > andrew > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: