Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437CEA9B.6020401@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( (Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
>> So what happens is that under reasonable load we are actually waiting >> for the CPU to process the code. >> >> > > This is the performance profile for PHP, not for Postgresql. This is > the post And your point? PostgreSQL benefits directly from what I am speaking about as well. >> Performance of PHP, not postgresql. >> >> Actually both. > [snip] > > Running postgresql on a single drive RAID 1 with PHP on the same > machine is not a typical installation. > Want to bet? What do you think the majority of people hosting at rackshack, rackspace, superrack etc... are doing? Or how about all those virtual hosts? > 300ms for PHP in CPU time? wow dude - that's quite a page. PHP > typical can handle up to 30-50 pages per second for a typical OLTP > application on a single CPU box. Something is really wrong with that > system if it takes 300ms per page. > There is wait time associated with that because we are hitting it with 50-100 connections at a time. Joshua D. Drake > Alex. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: