Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437B24FD-8741-44B5-9BA7-6FAF1DD11FC3@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats) (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sep 17, 2020, at 5:40 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2020-Sep-17, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:45:02PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>> My spidey sense is tingling here, telling me that we need some actual >>> benchmarking. >> >> This patch has not received any replies after this comment for three >> months, so I am marking it as returned with feedback. I agree that >> this should be benchmarked carefully. Yes, I have prioritized a couple other patches over this one, with benchmarking this patch lower down my priority list. Thank you, Michael, for the reminder! > > It seems fine to mark the patch as RwF at the end of commitfest, but > that's two weeks away. I don't understand what is accomplished by doing > it ahead of time, other than alienating the patch authors. Thanks, Álvaro! I do not feel alienated, and I hope Haribabu Kommi does not either. Haribabu, do you have an opinion on which of the two patches should proceed? I don't recall seeing a response from you aboutwhether you liked what I did with your patch. Perhaps you were waiting on the benchmarking results? — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: