Re: generic builtin functions
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: generic builtin functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4373AD87.2010006@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: generic builtin functions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: generic builtin functions
Re: generic builtin functions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > >>What I want to have is some builtin functions that can be used as the >>input/output/cast/etc functions for each enum type. >> >> > >The hard part of that is going to be figuring out how to get the >information to the functions about which enum type they're being invoked >for. Output functions in particular are handed little except the data >value itself. > >Possibly the internal representation of an enum could be 8 bytes: 4 >bytes for type OID and 4 more for value. No doubt the mysql guys would >rag on us for using too much disk space :-(. But if you did that then >the generics would just be anyenum and done. > > Eek! I would be prepared to go to quite a lot of trouble to avoid that. My idea was to have the functions that need access to the text values look up fcinfo->flinfo->fn_oid and then use that to look up the type info. But that would mean we would need pg_proc entries for these functions for each enum, even if it's the same function underneath, wouldn't it? >>I guess we could invent an anyenum pseudotype without actually exposing >>it via the grammar. >> >> > >Why do you think you need to hide it? > > > > Just desire not to clutter needlessly. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: