Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
От | Michael Paesold |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437114ED.1040603@gmx.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > >>Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes: >> >>>I am definatly not going to use -march=pentium4 in any production >>>system. Should I open a bug report with RedHat (gcc vendor)? > > >>Yeah, but they'll probably want a smaller test case than "Postgres fails >>its regression tests" :-( > > > I have just confirmed that the problem still exists in FC4's current > compiler (gcc 4.0.1, gcc-4.0.1-4.fc4), which probably will boost up the > priority of the complaint quite a long way in Red Hat's eyes. > > I've also confirmed that the problem is in interval_div; you can > reproduce the failure with > > select '41 years 1 mon 11 days'::interval / 10; [snip] Would you mind reporting this to RedHat Bugzilla? I believe a bug report from you would have more weight then mine, because you actually understand what's going on here. :-) Otherwise I am going to do do my best... Best Regards, Michael Paesold
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: