Re: Query tool margin
От | Andreas Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query tool margin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 436B6BD9.7030307@pse-consulting.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query tool margin ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] >>Sent: 04 November 2005 14:03 >>To: Dave Page >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers >>Subject: Re: Query tool margin >> >>Dave Page wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] >>>>Sent: 04 November 2005 13:48 >>>>To: Dave Page >>>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers >>>>Subject: Re: Query tool margin >>>> >>>>Use ConvertDialogToPixels. >>>>I'm still not happy, do we really need this? 999 wouldn't be >>>>enough, I >>>>do have bigger scripts. Additionally, screenshots need to >> >>be updated. >> >>> >>>I ran into the problem very recently when debugging some >> >>functions - the >> >>>backend helpfully told me where the problems were, but of >> >>course, I had >> >>>a script, not the function itself in the window that >> >>reported the error. >> >>The marker should show you the failing line, observing an offset if >>executed from a marked range; is that broken? > > > No, the function is not in the editor that reports the error, a script > that calls it is. The best we can do with the marker in this case is > mark the function call. The error from the backend tells me there is a > problem on line X of the marked function, which I then investigate in a > separate query window (with the create or replace function source). The function editor already has the line number margin. I hate it, reminds me of C64 BASIC... Regards, Andreas
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: