Re: Please HELP - URGENT - transaction wraparound error
От | John Sidney-Woollett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Please HELP - URGENT - transaction wraparound error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 436513E9.7050503@wardbrook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Please HELP - URGENT - transaction wraparound error (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Please HELP - URGENT - transaction wraparound error
Re: Please HELP - URGENT - transaction wraparound error |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hmm. I'm pretty sure that database mail_lxtreme was unused (no connections/activity) - I didn't think that it would need to be vacuumed at all... Just out of curiousity would the wraparound error (for mail_lxtreme) actually have affected data in bp_live? Could I just have deleted mail_lxtreme and then continued to use bp_live as though nothing had happened? Or had database bp_live already been damaged by the wraparound? Thanks for your great help/advice - it's much appreciated. John Tom Lane wrote: > John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw@wardbrook.com> writes: > >>OK, I restored the pgsql/data to another server and started up postgres >>and this is what I got: > > >> SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database; >> datname | age >>--------------+------------- >> mail_lxtreme | -2074187459 >> bp_live | 1079895636 >> template1 | 1076578064 >> template0 | -2074187459 >>(4 rows) > > >>mail_lxtreme is a test mail db and I don't care about it. So it could >>have been deleted without any worries... > > >>Which databases are a problem? Is it template0 or bp_live and template1? > > > mail_lxtreme is exactly the problem. You weren't vacuuming it... > > (template0 is a special case and can be ignored.) > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: