Re: why vacuum
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43610D7E.8060305@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why vacuum (Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@mobart.hr>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On 10/27/2005 8:34 AM, Mario Splivalo wrote: > Postgres itself offers no replication. Oracle itself offers no replication. IBM DB2 itself offers no replication. Yet most of the products out there for Oracle, DB2 and PostgreSQL are far better than what I read here: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/replication-features.html What a great example of "offering replication itself" ... *cough* I guess it'd be easier to port a well designed add-on like Slony-I to MySQL (now that they have triggers) than fixing their broken design. Not that I volunteer to do it, but Slony-I is released under BSD, anyone feel free to offer a good solution for MySQL. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: