Re: why vacuum
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4360DA65.6010601@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why vacuum (Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@mobart.hr>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On 10/27/2005 4:22 AM, Mario Splivalo wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:09 -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: >> > >> >> You must have missed the FAQ and other side notes about replication in >> the MySQL manual. Essentially MySQL replication is nothing but a query >> duplicating system, with the added sugar of taking care of now() and >> some other non-deterministic things, but not all of them. >> >> Non-deterministic user defined procedures, functions and triggers will >> simply blow MySQL's sophisticated replication apart. >> > > That is just not true. I haven't tried MySQL 4 and above, but in 3.5.x > replication wos working as expected, and the load that replication posed > was insignificant. The only TRUE problem was that replication was > unidirectional. That SAME problem has Slony, and other 'replication > systems' available for postgres. Read again. "Non-deterministic user defined procedures ...". Please give me *ONE* example of a user defined procedure in 3.5.x at all. You must have missed the point that stored procedures are a new feature in 5.0. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: