Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4352.1560698164@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
I wrote: > Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> OK, it seems the buildfarm is getting green again. I'm not sure why I'm >> seeing the failure in 011_crash_recovery.pl, while the buildfarm does >> not. Perhaps my environment is borked in some way? Not sure. > I see that Coelho's two bleeding-edge-clang animals are reporting that > failure too. Normally I'd just ignore those two; they break pretty > regularly. Maybe you're using an almost-bleeding-edge clang? Oh --- I managed to reproduce that failure locally on RHEL6 (nothing bleeding-edge anywhere), but it went away after make-clean-and-rebuild. I'm suspicious that the underlying cause was failure to recompile something that knows the value of CATALOG_VERSION_NO. This theory is insufficient to explain why Coelho's animals failed, though. Maybe it would, if you also posit a ccache screwup? But it's not obvious from their configurations that they're using ccache at all. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: