Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
От | Chris Travers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 434ECE90.5040005@travelamericas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: >On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:21:14PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > >>>Since the end reward for all this work would be having to read CATALOGS >>>WRITTEN IN ALL UPPER CASE, none of the key developers seem very >>>interested ... >>> >>> >>> >>> > >I think you're slightly missing the point. Most people won't need to >change any queries because unquoted identifiers are case-folded anyway. > > Right. That is part of the case for at least putting this on the TODO list. >Which way doesn't matter, as long as it's consistant. No the main >objection would be this (see below). Does anyone really want this? I'll >take lowercase anyday... (Note, it's not exact, some things aren't SQL >identifiers so would be left alone. But idea is the same.) > > Ok. If someone wanted it, we would see a patch already. I understand this. Probably making AS optional would be a bigger priority because such a patch exists already :-) However..... This is not only non-standard behavior but can also cause headaches in certain porting circumstances. Adding it to the TODO list would at least invite others to take this up *if* they (or their customers) required it. The work I see required would minimally be: 1) Add a GUC variable to allow for changing the case folding behavior. 2) Add duplicate entries for builtin aggregates and functions in the catalogs but with upper-case names 3) Adding a duplicate INFORMATION_SCHEMA with views off information_schema Additionally if people depend on case folding for catalogs, you would want to create a PG_CATALOG schema with views off pg_catalog. However, this seems to be peripheral and not central to the issues of managing the data given that identifiers are treated as already double-quoted. I *could* see a case where a company that does portability work (like EnterpriseDB, which specializes in Oracle portability) might find such a feature as important. Adding the item to the TODO list would invite patches where they are needed. Best Wishes, Chris Travers Metatron Technology Consulting
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: