Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
От | Klint Gore |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 434B4D2417E.F5C1KG@129.180.47.120 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:45:03 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > Oracle has a tendency to keep things around forever, which is nice, but > over the years it produces a system with lots of strange features that > make the system hard to use. PostgreSQL has a tendency to remove old, > unused stuff over time to keep the system easy to understand. This is > part of the reason we have not added CONCAT, because it doesn't really > add new functionality to the vast majority of our users. > > Sure, if someone wants to write scripts that work with PostgreSQL and > Oracle EBCDIC machines, it would be nice to have, but for 99% of our > users, it is just added cruft, and we have a tendency to try to reduce > cruft rather than make 1% of people happy, especially when the > extensibility system of PostgreSQL allows users to create their own > CONCAT functions if they desire. Where does textcat fit into things? klint. +---------------------------------------+-----------------+ : Klint Gore : "Non rhyming : : EMail : kg@kgb.une.edu.au : slang - the : : Snail : A.B.R.I. : possibilities : : Mail University of New England : are useless" : : Armidale NSW 2351 Australia : L.J.J. : : Fax : +61 2 6772 5376 : : +---------------------------------------+-----------------+
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: