Re: Performance on SUSE w/ reiserfs
От | Jon Brisbin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance on SUSE w/ reiserfs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 434AE7FF.4000705@npcinternational.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance on SUSE w/ reiserfs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance on SUSE w/ reiserfs
Re: Performance on SUSE w/ reiserfs Re: Performance on SUSE w/ reiserfs |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Are you sure it's not cached data pages, rather than cached inodes? > If so, the above behavior is *good*. > > People often have a mistaken notion that having near-zero free RAM means > they have a problem. In point of fact, that is the way it is supposed > to be (at least on Unix-like systems). This is just a reflection of the > kernel doing what it is supposed to do, which is to use all spare RAM > for caching recently accessed disk pages. If you're not swapping then > you do not have a problem. Except for the fact that my Java App server crashes when all the available memory is being used by caching and not reclaimed :-) If it wasn't for the app server going down, I probably wouldn't care. -- Jon Brisbin Webmaster NPC International, Inc.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: