Re: Oracle buys Innobase
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4347EC55.6030208@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle buys Innobase (Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/8/2005 4:34 AM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> schrieb: >> Ultimately, MySQL should drop InnoDB. > > http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?3,48400,48400#msg-48400 > > InnoDB is GPL. But, i'm also confused. > > My guess: a fork in the future. This whole GPL forking thing is still the same as it was before. One can only take the last version, released under GPL, and build a GPL-only project based on it. Oracle bought the copyright of InnoDB with the company. So if anything goes wrong during their upcoming relicensing talk, MySQL can of course fork off a GPL version of InnoDB, but that fork cannot be included in their commercial version of MySQL. What value would that fork have for them then? Using a pure GPL fork of InnoDB is in conflict with their own licensing scheme and I don't think MySQL is in the position to say bye to dual licensing. To have a really good position when talking to Oracle, MySQL will need to brush up on the BDB support, and that pretty quick. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: