Re: Certification Available +Pronounce
От | Robert Cleary |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Certification Available +Pronounce |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43440799.7050301@ul.ie обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Certification Available +Pronounce (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Certification Available +Pronounce
Re: Certification Available +Pronounce |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
I think this is the point where i humbly retreat,
i still think it's a fair argument that a certification would improve popularity - but for the aforesaid reasons, its probably not worth-it
based on the pros and cons.
thanks for the insight.
Josh Berkus wrote:
i still think it's a fair argument that a certification would improve popularity - but for the aforesaid reasons, its probably not worth-it
based on the pros and cons.
thanks for the insight.
Josh Berkus wrote:
Robert,If certifications are seen in a bad-light, I believe it's directly because people sell-out their principles, or just plain set-out to make cash.Well, actually: you're asking a group of users and proponents of an OSS RDBMS that has no certifications, and until a few years ago wasn't supported by any large companies and didn't have any compliance certificates or major reference implementations, what they think of certifications. What answer did you expect to get? Serious hackers never like certifications; they see them as something that their boss is liable to waste their time making them take. The people who like certifications will not generally be subscribed to this list.This might be a mad-idea, but if you can build an open-source DBMS, why can't you build a certification by the same process?: open-source collaboration for its inception, elaboration, construction and deployment?Well, first off, how would you keep the questions secret from potential test-takers? Also, keep in mind that designing a good certification exam is a lot of work, like 1000 hours of work. I'm lazy ... I'd rather just let SRA do their thing. ;-)
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: