Re: Comparative performance
От | Joe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comparative performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4342F61A.1010903@freedomcircle.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Comparative performance ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Make sure these indexes exist if you'll be updating or inserting into > entry: > > CREATE INDEX topic__subject_id ON topic(subject_id); > CREATE INDEX topic__actor_id ON topic(actor_id); Actually, topic's primary key is topic_id. > Also, the fact that subject and actor both point to topic along with > subject_type and actor_type make me suspect that your design is > de-normalized. Of course there's no way to know without more info. Yes, the design is denormalized. The reason is that a book or article is usually by a single author (an "actor" topic) and it will be listed under one main topic (a "subject" topic). There's a topic_entry table where additional actors and subjects can be added. It's somewhat ironic because I used to teach and/or preach normalization and the "goodness" of a 3NF+ design (also about having the database do aggregation and sorting as you mentioned in your other email). > FWIW, I usually use timestamptz for both created and updated fields. IIRC 'created' ended up as a DATE because MySQL 4 has a restriction about a single TIMESTAMP column per table taking the default value of current_timestamp. Joe
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: