Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4342259D.1060102@empires.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition (mark@mark.mielke.cc) |
Ответы |
Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> It's not an easy decision. Linux isn't wrong. Solaris isn't wrong. > Most people never hit these problems, and the people that do, are > just as likely to hit one problem, or the other. The grass is always > greener on the side of the fence that isn't hurting me right now, > and all that. > > Cheers, > mark > Thanks, a very informative reply. Do you have some references where I can learn more? I think that I've run into the OOM killer without a fork() being involved, but I could be wrong. Is it possible to be hit by the OOM killer if no applications use fork()? Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: