Re: Portable PostgreSQL
От | Samik Raychaudhuri |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Portable PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4341C329.4080803@freeshell.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Portable PostgreSQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/3/2005 12:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >Samik Raychaudhuri <samik@freeshell.org> writes: > > >>... What I wanted is a no-trace (or minimal trace), no-admin required >>kind of installation (I won't be able to create a non-admin user in the >>comp), which, when I am done, I can just delete the installation >>directory and will be clear. >> >> > >Postgres isn't really designed to be the sort of "embedded" database >that you seem to be after. You should look at other alternatives. >(Berkeley DB is one possibility that's written by friends of ours ;-)) > >In particular, you'll get zero sympathy here for any request to let the >database run as an admin-level user. The IPC communication structure we >use does not allow restricting requests to just one program, and hence >ignoring security issues is simply not a sane thing to do. > > regards, tom lane > > Thanks for replying Tom. I am not planning to run the DB as admin-level, just as a normal user. I am actually ready to compromise some security (it will run inside a local n/w, won't be exposed to internet, there are firewall inplace etc.) against the learning curve for a new database. Don't want to leave my favorite db I guess :-)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: