Re: Removing unneeded self joins
От | Anastasia Lubennikova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Removing unneeded self joins |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 433c3093-6b94-8c68-f5e1-3a0ec1124ab9@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Removing unneeded self joins ("Andrey V. Lepikhov" <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 31.10.2020 12:26, Andrey V. Lepikhov wrote: > Thank you for this partial review, I included your changes: > > On 9/23/20 9:23 AM, David Rowley wrote: >> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 17:43, Andrey Lepikhov >> <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> Doing thing the way I describe will allow you to get rid of all the >> UniqueRelInfo stuff. > Thanks for the review and sorry for the late reply. > I fixed small mistakes, mentioned in your letter. > Also I rewrote this patch at your suggestion [1]. > Because of many changes, this patch can be viewed as a sketch. > > To change self-join detection algorithm I used your delta patch from > [2]. I added in the split_selfjoin_quals routine complex expressions > handling for demonstration. But, it is not very useful with current > infrastructure, i think. > > Also I implemented one additional way for self-join detection > algorithm: if the join target list isn't contained vars from inner > relation, then we can detect self-join with only quals like a1.x=a2.y > if check innerrel_is_unique is true. > Analysis of the target list is contained in the new routine - > tlist_contains_rel_exprs - rewritten version of the > build_joinrel_tlist routine. > > Also changes of the join_is_removable() routine is removed from the > patch. I couldn't understand why it is needed here. > > Note, this patch causes change of one join.sql regression test output. > It is not a bug, but maybe fixed. > > Applied over commit 4a071afbd0. > > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f8p-KiEujr12k-oa52JNWWaQUjEjNg%2Bo1MGZk4mHBn_Rg%40mail.gmail.com > [2] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f8cJOCGyoxi7a_LG7eu%2BWKF9%2BHTff3wp1KKS5gcUg2Qfg%40mail.gmail.com > Status update for a commitfest entry. This entry was "Waiting on author" during this CF. As I see, the latest message contains new version of the patch. Does it need more work? Are you going to continue working on it? -- Anastasia Lubennikova Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: