Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 433C166C.6060300@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 9/29/2005 3:44 AM, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: >> I'm the one that Chris mentioned that did the performance tuning on RT. >> Best Practical are really good people to work with, but they will only >> use code that will work across all databases the support. There was one >> query in particular that made really horrible use of OR clauses. I sent >> in details on how to rewrite the query using unions, which changed it >> query from a "execute your query and go make coffee" type of query to >> one that completed in a very reasonable period of time. I was told that >> it wasn't an option because MySQL didn't have Unions. > > MySQL 4 has unions... ... as well as a different license for the client library. Might not be a problem for RT itself, but you know, some people have multiple databases with different applications, so 3.x backward support has some value in it. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: