Re: Vacuum questions...
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum questions... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 433993D2.2050408@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vacuum questions... ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum questions...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/24/2005 8:17 PM, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Would it be difficult to vacuum as part of a dump? The reasoning behind > this is that you have to read the table to do the dump anyway, I think aside from what's been said so far, it would be rather difficult anyway. pg_dump relies on MVCC and requires to run in one transaction to see a consistent snapshot while vacuum jiggles around with transactions in some rather non-standard way. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: