Re: 2 forks for md5?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2 forks for md5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4335A57B.8000309@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2 forks for md5? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2 forks for md5?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: >Tom Lane wrote: > > >> >>I'm coming to agree with Andrew that a documentation patch might be the >>best answer. But where to put it ... under the description of the >>log_connections GUC var? >> >> > >I am thinking we should wait for someone else to notice the double log >entries before mentioning it in the docs. > > If I had a more Machiavellian bent I would make sure that happened ;-) How about this note under log_connections?: "Some clients (notably psql) sometimes try to connect without a password before trying with a password. This behaviour will generate two log lines if log_connections is turned on, even though to the user it appears that only one connection has occurred." cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: