Re: logging blemishes
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logging blemishes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4331B836.9040905@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logging blemishes (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: logging blemishes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: >Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > >>>>Example (log_line_prefix = '%t %q%u@%d %r %p %c:%l'): >>>> >>>>2005-09-19 19:16:39 EDT [unknown]@[unknown] 6541 432f46d7.198d:1 LOG: >>>>connection received: host=[local] port= >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>In the case above, I rather expected %q to kick in. With the additional >>tests it would. >> >>It's debatable, though, and not hugely important either way, I think. >> >> > >Are you saying "connection received" should honor %q? It seems it is a >session line, rather than a server line, no? > > > Maybe, the line just struck me as rather ugly. Never mind. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: