Re: full outer join performance
| От | Ben |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: full outer join performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 432720DC.8030102@silentmedia.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: full outer join performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
I see. I think I'm going to restructure my logic so I won't have to use the outer join after all, but thanks for the pointers anyway. Tom Lane wrote: >Ben <bench@silentmedia.com> writes: > > >>Hrm, as I understand that page, there's not much that can be done about >>the join order for outer joins. At least, not when there's on 3 tables >>and 1 outer join involved. Am I missing something? >> >> > >Without knowing what you want the query to do, it's difficult to say if >it's OK to rearrange the join order. > >Frequently it's OK to rearrange the join order even without risking any >change in the query results, but PG doesn't currently have any smarts >about that, so you have to do it manually by changing the query. > > regards, tom lane > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: