Re: FAQ/HTML standard?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FAQ/HTML standard? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4323266A.1060509@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FAQ/HTML standard? (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: FAQ/HTML standard?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruno Wolff III wrote: >On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:10:19 -0400, > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > >>Is there an HTML standard that we try to follow in our HTML docs such as >>FAQs? >> >>If there isn't an explicit standard, may I suggest that we adopt XHTML >>1.0 as the standard? >> >> > >I ran accross an article a few weeks ago that suggested that this wasn't >all that great of an idea. Using HTML 4.01 should be just as useful. > > > I ran a cross a man in the street the other day who told me just the opposite ;-) Seriously, if you to use an argument like this you need to cite the article, or at the very least summarise its arguments. XHTML is simply a minimal reformulation of HTML in XML, and even uses the HTML 4.01 definitions for its semantics. Given that, it's hard to see why it should be considered a bad thing. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: