Re: Code of Conduct plan
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 431a1438-f720-4df9-939b-a6639b7a80cd@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Code of Conduct plan (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 06/06/2018 11:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> Yeah, somebody else made a similar point upthread. I guess we felt that >> the proper procedure was obvious given the structure, but maybe not. >> I could support adding text to clarify this, perhaps along the line of > > Hmm ... actually, there's another special case that's not discussed, > which is what happens if a committee or core member wants to file a > complaint against someone else? They certainly shouldn't get to rule > on their own complaint. So maybe change "complaint against" to > "complaint by or against" in my proposed addition, and then we're good. Well that is a standard conflict of interest issue. Having simple language that says something such as: A Member involved in complaints may not vote/rule on issues reported by the respective member. JD > > regards, tom lane > -- Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc *** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. *** PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development. Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: