Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4317.1478702867@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files? (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0
in catalog head files?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I don't think we need "named constants", especially not >> manually-maintained ones. The thing that would help in pg_proc.h is for >> numeric type OIDs to be replaced by type names. We talked awhile back >> about introducing some sort of preprocessing step that would allow doing >> that --- ie, it would look into some precursor file for pg_type.h and >> extract the appropriate OID automatically. I'm too tired to go find the >> thread right now, but it was mostly about building the long-DATA-lines >> representation from something easier to edit. > You mean that I guess: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4d191a530911041228v621286a7q6a98d9ab8a2ed734@mail.gmail.com Hmm, that's from 2009. I thought I remembered something much more recent, like last year or so. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: