Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time
От | Tony Caduto |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4315F32C.1020506@amsoftwaredesign.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time
Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, What exactly does it check then? What I pointed out is simple "syntax" checking in other languages. From what I have seen it does not check anything in the body of the function, I can put gibberish in the body as long as it has a begin and end. It does not seem to be doing anything differently than 8.0.x does with function syntax checking at create time, so why even mention it in the release notes? the function below also raises no errors at create, but at run time it does. If I run the below function I get this error: PostgreSQL Error Code: (1) ERROR: type "record44" does not exist From what I read in the release notes I was expecting to see this raised at create time. Users coming from systems like Oracle and M$ SQL server are expecting this stuff to be caught at create not run time. How difficult would it be to have the server just run the function at create time with null for any input params? Of course a user could just do this but it is a annoying second step. CREATE or REPLACE FUNCTION public.test_func9(out firstname varchar,out lastname varchar) RETURNS SETOF pg_catalog.record AS $BODY$ Declare row record44; BEGIN asfdfdfdfafdsfsdfsdf sdf bla bla sdf yada yada s df sd fsd END; $BODY$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE; Thanks, Tony Tom Lane wrote: >Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com> writes: > > >>notice the for in select, it's for sure wrong, but it raises no errors >>until I execute the function >>also note the declaration for row, there is no record56 type, but it >>raises no errors at create. >> >> > >It's *syntax* checking, not an exhaustive check that the function is OK. > > regards, tom lane > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: