Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4311.1216333699@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на |
Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] "\ef |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@oryx.com> writes: > Though I must say it would have been even MORE horrible to copy all this > code into the backend to make pg_get_functiondef(), notwithstanding the > extra utility of a generally-callable function. FWIW, I just found myself forced to invent pg_get_function_arguments() and pg_get_function_result(), because the TABLE function patch has pushed the complexity of printing function argument and result types well beyond the bounds of sanity. (Pavel had hacked up pg_dump and ignored psql's \df ...) It wouldn't take a whole lot to convince me that a pg_get_functiondef would be useful, although I don't foresee either of those applications wanting to use it because of their backward-compatibility constraints. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: