Re: Areca 1260 Performance
| От | Gene |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Areca 1260 Performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 430d92a20612070802q3cffeaeav2cf40c999ebc712b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Areca 1260 Performance (Shane Ambler <pgsql@007Marketing.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
I'm building a SuperServer 6035B server (16 scsi drives). My schema has basically two large tables (million+ per day) each which are partitioned daily, and queried independently of each other. Would you recommend a raid1 system partition and 14 drives in a raid 10 or should i create separate partitions/tablespaces for the two large tables and indexes?
Thanks
Gene
--
Gene Hart
cell: 443-604-2679
Thanks
Gene
On 12/7/06, Shane Ambler <pgsql@007marketing.com> wrote:
>> One thing that is clear from what you've posted thus far is that you
>> are going to needmore HDs if you want to have any chance of fully
>> utilizing your Areca HW.
> Do you know off hand where I might find a chassis that can fit 24[+]
> drives? The last chassis we ordered was through Supermicro, and the
> largest they carry fits 16 drives.
Chenbro has a 24 drive case - the largest I have seen. It fits the big
4/8 cpu boards as well.
http://www.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_01features.php?serno=43
--
Shane Ambler
pgSQL@007Marketing.com
Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
--
Gene Hart
cell: 443-604-2679
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: