Re: Postgresql replication
От | Tino Wildenhain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 430DC557.7090905@wildenhain.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql replication (William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql replication
|
Список | pgsql-general |
William Yu schrieb: > Tino Wildenhain wrote: > >>>> Which is the problem we face. Great, you've got multiple servers for >>>> failover. Too bad it doesn't do much good if your building gets hit >>>> by fire/earthquake/hurricane/etc. >> >> >> >> This would remove the application using that data too, or not? ;) > > > Yes and no. If your DB is an internal app for a company where the users > are in the same building as the servers, doesn't matter really I guess. > Meteor hitting the building would kill the users in addition to the > server so nobody will be calling you to complain about system downtime. > > If your app is used by external customers who are all across the > country, they want to continue to still use your software even though > you and data center #1 are 6 feet under due to an 8.0 earthquake. They > want auto-failover to data center #2 which is in close proximity to CIA > headquarters and other juicy terrorist targets. Sure, but in this case a "simple" async master-slave (slony-1) and the usual failover (also DNS-failover) should be sufficient.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: