Re: performance drop on RAID5
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance drop on RAID5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 430C9DA6.2080801@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | performance drop on RAID5 (Alexandre Barros <alexandre@vectorx.com.br>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Alexandre Barros wrote: > Hello, > i have a pg-8.0.3 running on Linux kernel 2.6.8, CPU Sempron > 2600+, 1Gb RAM on IDE HD ( which could be called a "heavy desktop" ), > measuring this performance with pgbench ( found on /contrib ) it gave > me an average ( after several runs ) of 170 transactions per second; That is going to be because IDE drives LIE about write times because of the large cache. > for the sake of experimentation ( actually, i'm scared this IDE drive > could fail at any time, hence i'm looking for an alternative, more > "robust", machine ), i've installed on an aging Compaq Proliant server > ( freshly compiled SMP kernel 2.6.12.5 with preemption ), dual > Pentium III Xeon 500Mhz, 512Mb RAM, (older) SCSI-2 80pin drives, and > re-tested, when the database was on a single SCSI drive, pgbench gave > me an average of 90 transactions per second, but, and that scared me > most, when the database was on a RAID-5 array ( four 9Gb disks, using > linux software RAID mdadm and LVM2, with the default filesystem > cluster size of 32Kb ), the performance dropped to about 55 > transactions per second. That seems more reasonable and probably truthful. I would be curious what type of performance you would get with the exact same setup EXCEPT remove LVM2. Just have the software RAID. In fact, since you have 4 drives you could do RAID 10. > > i wouldn't be so stunned if the newer machine was ( say ) twice faster > than the older server, but over three times faster is disturbing. > > the postgresql.conf of both machines is here: > > max_connections = 50 > shared_buffers = 1000 # min 16, at least max_connections*2, > 8KB each You should look at the annotated conf: http://www.powerpostgresql.com/Downloads/annotated_conf_80.html Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > debug_print_parse = false > debug_print_rewritten = false > debug_print_plan = false > debug_pretty_print = false > log_statement = 'all' > log_parser_stats = false > log_planner_stats = false > log_executor_stats = false > log_statement_stats = false > lc_messages = 'en_US' # locale for system error message strings > lc_monetary = 'en_US' # locale for monetary formatting > lc_numeric = 'en_US' # locale for number formatting > lc_time = 'en_US' # locale for time formatting > > many thanks in advance ! > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: