Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL
От | Chris Travers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43063D81.1040107@travelamericas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Many of you might have read this Slashdot item about Linux Mark >> Institute charging for the use of the Linux trademark by companies: >> >> http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/19/1154231&tid=167&tid=106 >> >> >> How do we guarantee to companies promoting PostgreSQL that this will not >> happen to them? > > > That is a good question. The short answer is that the PostgreSQL > Trademark is pretty unenforceable. The long answer is we transfer it to > a non-profit entity that is in charge of that kind of thing for > PostgreSQL. I don't think that this will cut it. The short answer is OK in the sense that an unprotected trademark is pretty weak (IANAL), but how does this prevent something from happening down the road? What if someone attempts to build trademark value at some point (this is really what is happening with Linux, and I have no problem with it). I think that the best answer we can come up with is this: We need to offer a set of clear guidelines for using the trademark. What do you have to do if you want to call your proprietary product PostgreSQL? What if you want to call it "Built on PostgreSQL?" It might be worth hiring a trademark lawyer and see what would be required to put out a license that was free of charge and global. Something along the lines of: Uses of the PostgreSQL Trademark: This license grants you the license to call your product "PostgreSQL" provided that you only use community source code and/or contribute your changes back to the community. If you wish to add proprietary extensions you must at least add adjectives or your company name to the product name. For example "ACME PostgreSQL" or "PostgreSQL by Example Corporation." Any products marketed as "Built On PostgreSQL" must use as their base the community source code and provide compatibility with stock releases. The idea is to provide recourse against someone who might, for example, offer a diluted product, breaking compatibility without letting people know, etc. Best Wishes, Chris Travers Metatron Technology Consulting
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: