Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core

Dave Cramer wrote:
> Well, if we are going to consider pljava for the main distribution,  
> then we should consider pl-j  for inclusion as well.

I believe we should consider both but only include 1.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Dave
> On 16-Aug-05, at 11:53 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
>> Folks,
>>
>>
>>> I think you should take a closer look at PL/Java for the following  
>>> reasons:
>>>
>>
>> Hmmm, this brings up a good point.   If we're going to consider PL/ 
>> Ruby for
>> main distro in 8.2, should we not consider PL/Java as well?
>>
>> -- 
>> Josh Berkus
>> Aglio Database Solutions
>> San Francisco
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of  broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>>        subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that  your
>>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/