Re: How to Build Postgres in a Portable / Relocatable fashion?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to Build Postgres in a Portable / Relocatable fashion? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42b0bfdf-f6e8-4db9-8178-b9d112c475ce@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How to Build Postgres in a Portable / Relocatable fashion? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to Build Postgres in a Portable / Relocatable fashion?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/3/24 17:07, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:27:12PM +0000, AJ ONeal wrote: >>>> Back in the good old days there was official 1st-party support for Linux: >>> This >>> was/is a third party site. >> >> Oh. I thought that EDB was *the* Postgres company like MySQL AB was *the* MySQL company. My mistake. > > How did you come to that conclusion? Is there something we could do to > avoid this assumption. > From here: https://www.enterprisedb.com/ #1 IN POSTGRES THE MOST ADMIRED, DESIRED, & USED DATABASE. is not helpful. Though I would say the bigger issue is here: https://www.postgresql.org/download/ Where you have Packages and Installers and then further down 3rd party distributions It tends to imply that the 'Packages and Installers' are not third party, when they are to some degree or another. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: