Re: Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42FE3A5C.4000605@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changes improve the performance of INSERT and UPDATE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Hiroki Kataoka <kataoka@interwiz.jp> writes: > >>>>This small patch improves the performance of INSERT and UPDATE. By my >>>>machine, these changes raised the performance about 5%~10% in pgbench. >>> >>>BTW, in profiling the backend I've never seen PageAddItem take more than >>>about 1% of the runtime, and in pgbench in particular it seems to be >>>down around 0.1% ... so the above seems a bit optimistic ... > > >>I have the nearly same result, but pgbench says different. I don't know >>why my test generates 5~10% performance improvement. Therefore, I want >>to take a benchmark in a reliable environment. > > > I've been testing this patch a bit, and I'm unable to measure any > consistent improvement in pgbench times (sometimes it seems to win, > and some other times it doesn't). And gprof still swears up and down > that PageAddItem is only about 0.1% of the runtime, which would make > it impossible to obtain more than an 0.1% speedup. I'm inclined to > write off your result as measurement error --- it's notoriously hard > to get reproducible results out of pgbench. I played with the patch two weeks ago (pgbench and some bulkloading of production data as well as restores from large dumps) - afair I have been unable to measure any noticable real-life improvement. Trusting pgbench is quite difficult for such tests - I can get easily up to 15% variation on consecutive runs on my boxes here ... Stefan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: