Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON
От
Jeff Davis
Тема
Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON
Дата
Msg-id
42F90E82.7050600@empires.org
Ответ на
Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON (Chris Travers)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
[OT] Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>
Re: [OT] Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON Robert Bernier <robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca>
Re: [OT] Re: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>
Re: Writing Books WAS: Thoughs after discussions at OSCON Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Chris Travers wrote: > The problem is pervasive in both proprietary and open source apps > because the developer sees the RDBMS merely as a simple data store for > his/her application. The idea that the database might serve several > apps never occurs to them. Hence it makes real sense to put as much > logic into the application level as possible because if you put it in > the database, then that makes more work if you have to switch RDBMS's. > Many people do develop that way: the database is just a place to throw bits and get 'em back later. I don't think we're going to change that any time soon. I think in a way, one of our allies is SQLLite, which sounds a little strange. However, it's very simple, gets the job done (that is, puts bits on physical storage and retrieves them), and doesn't claim to be something it's not. MySQL gets on our nerves because they equate their capabilities with those of PostgreSQL. SQLLite has also recently replaced MySQL as the "built-in" database layer for PHP. Hopefully that will cause a lot of people will associate MySQL with SQLLite rather than PostgreSQL. Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления