Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup

Jaime Casanova wrote:
<blockquote cite="midc2d9e70e050802101941a74849@mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  On 8/2/05, Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com> wrote:


    I've been trying to track down some performance problems that I am
having doing large inserts on tables with foreign keys.

I'm 99% sure that the issue I am having is BUG 1552 -
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php

When I read the whole thread, I got the impression that a fix (or maybe
a hack) had been put into the 8.0 branch.  I'm running 8.0.3, and I'm
seeing the issue.  I can go into more details if desired...

So my questions are:
1) Would that fix have made it into the 8.0.3 release - alternatively,
how can I figure that out myself?
2) Is there a bug tracker somewhere, or do you just track bugs on the
mailing list?  I haven't been able to find anything on your site.

Thanks,

Dan




What part of the discussion gives you that impression... I understood
that Tom will (in the future) see a fix when Neil finish the framework
to replan prepared statements (or is rebuild cached plans where the
table size has grow significantly?)

PD: This is not the list for this discussion... i am forwarding you to
another(randomly choosen) list.



This posting seems to indicate that there was a change made:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php


What is the proper way to discuss bugs?  The only thing I have found on
the website is the link for reporting new bugs, (which just sends an
e-mail to the bugs mailing list?)

Since I didn't see any bug tracker software, I figured (wrongly) that
you must just discuss bugs on the bugs list...

Dan

--
****************************
Daniel Armbrust
Biomedical Informatics
Mayo Clinic Rochester
daniel.armbrust(at)mayo.edu
http://informatics.mayo.edu/