Re: Postgresql with max_connections=4096
От | denis@edistar.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql with max_connections=4096 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42E88750.6080201@edistar.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql with max_connections=4096 (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
With the last test I made, the database is swapping but in a very slow way... 100K every 10 minutes and that seems to not be a problem... in the sense that the server doesn't slow down... Today I'll make other tests and let you know. Thank you, Denis Scott Marlowe wrote: >On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:53, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > >>On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:46:56PM +0200, denis@edistar.com wrote: >> >> >>>I'm now testing with pg_pool installed on each apache frontend with 260 >>>pg_pool preforked clients in each machine. >>> >>>The database seems to work better. At least when it goes to swap it >>>doesn't stop working... >>> >>> >>Wait, are you saying your database server is swapping? You'll never get >>any kind of performance if that's the case. >> >> > >IF it swaps out unused code / data and leaves it, that's fine, but if >it's constantly swapping out then yeah, that's a VERY bad thing. > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: