Re: jdbc xa patches
От | Oliver Jowett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jdbc xa patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42E80CBB.1030006@opencloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: jdbc xa patches (Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: jdbc xa patches
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Vadim Nasardinov wrote: > On Wednesday 27 July 2005 00:33, Oliver Jowett wrote: > >>>>Having ResourceAssociationState as a full-blown class seems like >>>>overkill since you only have one instance anyway. >>> >>>Maybe. Java 1.4 doesn't have enums. What do you suggest as an >>>alternative? >> >>Just a bare int? > > > Java 1.4's typesafe enum pattern doesn't usually strike me as an > overkill, as long as you're aware of its problems: > > http://www.google.com/search?q=Java+typesafe+enum Shrug, the main reason for an enum-like pattern is to get type safety, but in this case there's only one field that ever uses the enum (and it's never passed around as a parameter), so there's not much scope for getting it wrong. -O
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: