Re: TRUNCATE locking problem
От | Joe Maldonado |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TRUNCATE locking problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42DBC4FC.2080605@webehosting.biz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TRUNCATE locking problem (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: TRUNCATE locking problem
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks...I just wanted to verify that it was the intended behaviour prior to going in and changing code :) - Joe Maldonado Tom Lane wrote: >Joe Maldonado <jmaldonado@webehosting.biz> writes: > > >>It seems that TRUNCATE is first posting a lock on the table and then >>waiting for other transactions to finish before truncating the table >>thus blocking all other operations. >> >> > >That's what it's supposed to do. If you have a problem with the length >of the delay, find the (other) transaction that's accessing the table >for too long and fix that. > > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: