Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42CD5344.1060707@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>Just to make my position perfectly clear: I don't want to see this >>option shipped in 8.1. It's reasonable to have it in there for now >>as an aid to our performance investigations, but I don't see that it >>has any value for production. > > > Well, this is the first I am hearing that, and of course your position > is just one vote. True but your "feature" was added after feature freeze ;). I don't see this as a good thing overall. We should be looking for a solution not a band-aid that if you tear it off will pull the skin. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: