Re: getBinaryStream and OutOfMemoryException
От | Jesper Thorhauge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: getBinaryStream and OutOfMemoryException |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42C152EF.305@conzentrate.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: getBinaryStream and OutOfMemoryException (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: getBinaryStream and OutOfMemoryException
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Okay, thats seems like a lot!! What are the priorities about getting this modification into the driver? I have seen some other posts regarding this binaryStream / memory problem, so it seems that i'm not the only one :-) Oliver Jowett wrote: >Jesper Thorhauge wrote: > > >>Okay, thanks alot for the quick answer! I was wondering, do you know how >>much more efficient it could be done using the binary format you are >>mentioning? I'm especially interested in decreasing the amount of memory >>used to get large bytea values... >> >> > >Um, rough estimate would be about a factor of 5 (assume text >representation of bytea averages about ~2.5 characters per raw byte, and >characters are 16 bits on the Java side) > >-O > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: