Re: tsearch2 changes need backpatching?

Tom Lane wrote:

>  However, we cannot
>backpatch the change without forcing initdb (or at least reindex of
>tsearch2 indexes), even on architectures that are not currently broken.
>So I'm afraid penguin is out of luck --- the 8.0 branch has to stay
>the way it is.
>
>
>  
>

With that exception, we now have only one machine marked active that has 
consistently failed on HEAD or REL8_0_STABLE: osprey (NetBSD 2.0 gcc 
3.3.3 m68k)

I have asked its owner to look into what the problems might be.

I am about to start publishing owner email addresses (in a hard to 
harvest way)  so that hackers can contact them directly about problems 
seen on their machines. This was raised about a week ago and nobody has 
raised an objection.

cheers

andrew