Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 42BAEC22.1040609@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/22/2005 1:29 AM, Neil Conway wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> The long-term point in my mind is that removing syntactical >> redundancy always reduces the ability to detect errors or report >> errors acccurately > > Lexical scoping is unambiguous in a language like PL/PgSQL. Since it is > simple to determine whether a given END matches an IF, LOOP, or BEGIN, I > don't see how it would reduce our "ability to detect errors or report > errors accurately". > >> Consider for example the possibility that Oracle's next release adds >> some new frammish that can't be duplicated because we chose not to >> distinguish various forms of "END xxx" ... > > As lexical scoping is still unambiguous, we could actually add a K_LOOP > / K_IF token to the input stream, if that would make you happier :) (Of > course I'm not suggesting this -- the point is that as far as the parser > is concerned, we should have precisely the same information for > disambiguating the input as we used to have.) > > BTW, I notice that Oracle actually allows: > > <<label>> > LOOP > -- ... > END LOOP label; But what if they decide to allow LOOP -- ... IF condition THEN EXIT; END LOOP; at some point? There you'd get ambiguity. Jan > > whereas we don't allow the optional label following END LOOP. Which goes > to my general point: this frammish has existed in PL/SQL for a while, > but it's not as if people are clamoring for us to implement it. I would > wager that most people care about having *equivalent* features to > PL/SQL, not exactly identical syntax. For example, the lack of > autonomous transactions is something people have asked for in the past, > because it *does* make porting PL/SQL applications more difficult. I > can't see anyone losing any sleep because we are slightly more relaxed > about the input we accept. > > -Neil > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: